arXiv Leaves Cornell After 35 Years to Go Independent

Opening

Dear reader, have you ever come across the name arXiv while searching for research papers? It’s the place where you can encounter the latest research in AI, physics, and mathematics before anyone else. From the technology underlying ChatGPT to the frontiers of quantum computing, the leading edge of science is now surfacing first not in academic journals, but on this preprint¹​ server.

Launched in 1991 by physicist Paul Ginsparg at Los Alamos National Laboratory, the service now hosts more than 2.4 million papers free of charge, with monthly downloads reaching 10 million. And yet, this massive knowledge infrastructure is run by a staff of just 27 people, on an annual operating budget of only $6.7 million (~₩9 billion).

News broke that on July 1 this year, arXiv will leave Cornell University—its home for the past 25 years—and transition into an independent nonprofit. This is not a simple organizational relocation. Behind this decision lie two structural pressures created by the AI era.

Walking a $6.7 Million Tightrope — Why Is arXiv Leaving?

arXiv’s independence isn’t a sudden decision. Founder Paul Ginsparg himself has recommended this direction for years. The core reason is money. arXiv has posted operating deficits in both 2024 and 2025. The 2025 deficit alone was $297,000 (~₩400 million). Cornell covered the shortfall and threw in an additional $819,000 (~₩1.1 billion) of in-kind support—but from the university’s standpoint, arXiv was always a line item competing against other budget demands.

The root cause of the problem is explosive growth. Submissions have surged more than 50% since 2022, and 2026 is expected to surpass 300,000 papers a year. There’s even a record of 26,000 papers received in the single month of September 2025.

This growth has two drivers.

First, the explosion of AI research itself. The number of papers in AI and machine learning is growing exponentially. Thomas Dietterich (Oregon State University), arXiv’s editor-in-chief for computer science, named this as a direct driver of growth.

Second, papers made by AI—so-called “AI slop.” Low-quality papers generated by LLMs are pouring into arXiv. According to Ralf Beers, chair of the editorial board (University of Amsterdam), submissions of AI slop have grown exponentially since early 2025, and the rejection rate has spiked from 4% to 10-12%. A study published in Nature Human Behaviour reported that, as of September 2024, roughly a quarter of computer science abstracts showed traces of LLM editing.

Within the walls of Cornell, it was hard to withstand these two pressures. The university couldn’t hire enough software developers, nor could it freely raise outside donations. Ginsparg himself acknowledged this—that universities, as institutions, have no track record of sustaining this kind of global research infrastructure over the long haul.